Are "Russian Hackers" always from Russia?
Nowadays, we can increasingly see press releases after cyberattacks that say that “it was a sophisticated attack, behind which there were statesmen,” which means that the attackers acted in the interests of one or more states. Along with Chinese and North Korean hackers, hackers supporting the Russian government are very often accused of attacks. Of course, we are not here to make blind accusations, so let’s look at a potential example where digital traces lead to Russian hackers.
Incident
It happened, your business has been attacked by crypto-ransomware. During the time-pressured incident response activities, you managed to collect some details: the ransomware note and the IP address from which the compromised account was connected. We’ll take a look at this using the MedusaLocker Ransomware and IP 87.251.70.100 as an example (Important Note: IP was chosen as an example and has never been seen as malicious related)
Pieces of evidence
Let’s take a look at the ransomware note:
(source of image https://www.pcrisk.com/removal-guides/16693-readinstructions-ransomware )
Contact details contain two email addresses, both under .ru domains, which are definitely associated with the Russian federation.
The second piece is IP – 87.251.70.100. A quick investigation on it with the most common public available tools shows it as Russian Federation located IP.
VirusTotal:
https://www.virustotal.com/gui/ip-address/87.251.70.100
Shodan:
https://www.shodan.io/host/87.251.70.100
On the surface, the case is solved and you’ve deduced that Russian hackers targeted your company. The information goes to the next morning press release and is quoted in all news agencies.
Not everything is as it seems
Let’s have a closer look from the perspective of a person who is well versed in Russian culture.
- Email addresses in the ransomware note are in different Russian domains bk.ru and mail.ru, but they belong to the same mail service provider Mail.ru Group. If the threat actor wanted to have two email addresses in case one is promptly shut down because of some abuse/spam report, what is the point of providing them with one email service with different domain names? Moreover, Mail.ru Group is well known in Russia for actively cooperating with law enforcement agencies.
- If the first email address does not make sense from a Russian language perspective, the other provides us with another suspicious clue. Email addresses tend to follow the most common pattern <firstname>.<lastname>, but “denis” and “gregory” are both first names. In Australian culture, it is not uncommon to have a first name as a surname, but in Russia, it is the opposite. There are patronymic names but they have quite specific writing rules and first names are never surnames.
- On the screenshot from Shodan, we can see the organisation as SA Geocentru, which again is uncommon from a Russian language perspective. Without deep-diving into Russian grammatical rules, “Geocentrru” or just “Geocentr” would have been less suspicious. A quick search on ISP “RM Engineering LLC” reveals the organisation site – http://rm-injinering.ru/ is still in “.ru domain” but looking at the contact information reveals an address located in Moldova. Additionally, it was confirmed in the “about us” section.
Based on the facts above, it would seem that a malicious actor(s) only pretended to be Russian related which could only be revealed with deep knowledge of the Russian language and culture. Here we come to the fact that any cultural competence extends the ability to see and understand “hidden” information. It is especially crucial in the cybersecurity field, where malicious actors are speaking in many languages and pretending to be other countries to cover their tracks. This illustrates that every avenue needs to be explored before attribution. Having experts with strong investigative skills and experience, diverse, multi-language darknet intelligence will help your business stay ahead of national threat actors.
Our security assurance team offers qualified OSINT service to help you find your security weaknesses and proactively harden your organisation’s IT infrastructure. Request a free consultation with our team today.
see our
Related resources
In today’s digital age, we all use a vast amount of information to conduct our business activities, sharing, and interacting with data across multiple devices and networks. As such confidentiality, integrity and availability are key. You only have to look at recent news headlines to realise that even organisations with comprehensive security strategies are still vulnerable to cybersecurity breaches. Vulnerabilities can lie within the technology being used, the cyber-awareness of its employees, and the sophistication of attacks.
There are images of extensive, verbose documents, complex definitions, and eye-watering Excel sheets when the term GRC is mentioned. For the past two decades, GRC has been central to core business processes across many organisations at both ends of the enterprise spectrum, as well as in the small-to-medium business space in recent times.
But the world has moved on; organisations are forced to embrace digital disruption and agility if they haven’t done so whole-heartedly. And this very disruption is positioning GRC to become less-than-ideal to solve the challenges that said disruption brings with it.
Phishing attacks have increased dramatically over the last few years, with the global pandemic escalating the situation further. Cybercriminals take advantage of insecurities and fear and play on human nature to trick and deceive. In fact, according to the OAIC, phishing attacks that involved compromised credentials accounted for 30% of all cyber incidents in the first half of 2021. And human error formed a major source of these breaches. Unfortunately, due to the clever social engineering tactics used by cybercriminals, technical filters alone aren’t sufficient to protect against phishing.
Mimecast recently released its State of Email Security Report for 2021. The fifth edition of its annual report used interviews with over twelve hundred of information technology and cybersecurity professionals across the globe to gather vital cybersecurity insights. The report offers an insight into the latest email threats along with advice on how to build cyber resilience and mitigate the risks of email-borne attacks.
Last month CrowdStrike released its 2020 Global Threat Report, reflecting on the past year’s cybercrime and the types of attacks and techniques criminals have been utilising. In this blog post, we take a look at the key trends from the report and what they mean to Australian businesses.
We're Here To Help